Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I built LFS like back in 2005 or something. I remember it took forever. I wonder if it's faster or slower now. My computer is definitely faster, but I also have a creeping suspicion the code has gotten a lot bigger. Then at some point I switched to gentoo. I remember I vacillated between gentoo and slackware. The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.


Significantly faster. A few months ago, after building a new rig for the first time in 6 years or so. I did a gentoo build from minimal to gnome, as exercise/burn-in/cooling testing. With the amount of RAM and cores available now compared to 2005, an 'emerge -e @world' only took a few hours vs the days and days it took back then.


Same, I used LFS for a couple months in college until I got annoyed about manual updates and switched to Gentoo. And back in those days you had to do it on actual hardware, not a VM. I had a job interviewer at the time who asked which Linux distro I used, and it was fun to tell them about that.

I would definitely recommend going through LFS to anyone maintaining Linux systems, it really helps you understand how things work.


It's almost certainly faster if your computer is remotely modern. Compilation scales pretty well with multi-core performance.


I did it in the early 2000s and last year. It's a bajillion times faster now.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: